Reader Wonders Why Crispin Stingy On Sharing Glory

share.jpg

Just after writing an article about a recent piece of work for Slim Jim done by Crispin Porter + Bogsky, we received this email from an Adrants reader who wonders why Crispin has so much trouble giving credit where credit is due:

"I just think it's interesting that CP+B has so much trouble giving credit to those with whom they collaborate on their campaigns. I was just reading some coverage of the iMedia Connection Brand Summit and found the following sentence a little disturbing, 'CPB also created a GTI Configurator that let online visitors customize their GTIs with all the available features, after which they could take a virtual joyride with the beautiful German Engineer, Helga.' I'm pretty sure IQ Interactive actually created the Configurator."

The reader continues: "Also, when visiting the GTI Creative Showcase - http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/10960.ASP - the only agency listed is CP+B. I read your comment last week about Barbarian Group facing the same thing with Subservient Chicken. We all know CP+B is the hot shop to be right now, so why do they have so much trouble sharing a little bit of the credit? What gives?!"

Indeed, Crispin. What gives? Of course CP + B is not alone here. All agencies do this. The only way we find out who really worked on stuff is when we get the press releases from the production companies.

by Steve Hall    Sep-19-06   Click to Comment   
Topic: Agencies   

Enjoy what you've read? Subscribe to Adrants Daily and receive the daily contents of this site each day along with free whitepapers.



Comments



Comments

That's the business. The CD takes credit for work and ideas that come from the AD. The AD take credits for the work performed by the production people. So of course an agency will take credit for the work done by partners and vendors. Its just how it goes.

Posted by: Ryan on September 19, 2006 4:42 PM

Isn't it pretty obvious why they don't give credit? They want everyone to think that they're the ones that have done all the work when in reality, they farm out their ideas because they can't do it themselves.

Posted by: Jason on September 19, 2006 4:43 PM

I don't necessarily disagree with Ryan above. However, when you don't even bother to "share" the glory, you'll burn some very important bridges that could affect your business in the long run. Then again... "That's the business" and I bet another agency will be the hot topic next year. That's usually the trend.

Posted by: Jason on September 19, 2006 4:49 PM

Crispin is trying to build their own interactive group. That's becasue they've burned almost every top shop in the business and no one will work for them anymore. When it comes to credit they just plain lie.

Posted by: Patrick on September 19, 2006 5:28 PM

I've seen cases where the agency farms out the concepting to propduction companies, it's called an open ended brief, or some bullshit and then takes all the credit. so it's rampant but it's dirty.

Posted by: paul on September 19, 2006 6:04 PM

CP+B = KB+P

Posted by: Edward on September 19, 2006 8:15 PM

I dont think CP+B farms out concepting, though. We've worked with them before and they come with the concepts already figured out. They're just really tough to make stuff with because of their timelines and endless tweaking.

Posted by: Jason on September 19, 2006 8:24 PM

I think they farm ALOT out. Check this out: portfolio.barbariangroup.com. See anything familiar.

Posted by: Teddy B. on September 20, 2006 9:00 AM

When I met them, I found them to be the most arrogant set of people I've come across in 10 years of being in the business.

Sure they do good work but it's not exactly curing cancer is it - so relax, check the ego and give the people who work hard for you some credit.

I know of 3 agencies who will never work with them again for a variety of reasons - and they're all good agencies with excellent reps.

Interesting to see that most of their MINI US work seemed to be a exact copy of the UK work created by WCRS & Cunning.

Oh well, what goes around comes around eh?

Posted by: Adam Rant on September 20, 2006 10:46 AM

Regarding the offending bit of coverage in relation to CPB, I think it's worth noting that journalists often leave out key credits/details in their reporting. In the course of putting the spotlight on certain companies, others that are due credit are often inadvertently left out... which very well may be the case in this instance.

Posted by: Roger Darnell on September 20, 2006 1:44 PM

Actually, CP&B kinda is helping cure cancer....or at least curtail it. They partner with Arnold on all the truth work.

Posted by: Mark P on September 20, 2006 1:46 PM

I've heard of people "winning" awards for work they never even touched (i.e. taking credit for a freelancers' work).

Posted by: Some girl on September 20, 2006 2:06 PM

Thanks for the post -- I so agree about sharing credit. It takes a ton of people to build out these campaigns, and credit should be provided to everyone who contributes. It should be viewed as a collaborative effort between agencies and production companies, instead of a "farm out," in my humble opinion.

Posted by: Amanda Kelso [TypeKey Profile Page] on September 20, 2006 2:11 PM

To pose another q: Im curious as to how other groups deal with showing the work in a portfolio? As a creative and production partner for agencies, we (almost) always get credit for the campaigns we work on - and we assist with concepts, visual assets, executions, etc. But there are times when we are told that we can NOT show the work in our portfolio/reel (work-for-hire). This obviously becomes an issue if we are denied the ability to use our work to market ourselves and can result in us passing on the work. Its rare, but it happens sometimes generally with agencies that are incredulous with our need to show others work we have done. Thoughts?

Posted by: chuck on September 20, 2006 2:42 PM

If all these interactive shops are the brains behind the work, how come they can't make anything great without an agency. Yet the agencies like Goodby, Crispin, and some others seem to do great work regardless of who they work with.

Posted by: Dave on September 20, 2006 10:08 PM

I left the world of big agencies to start my own interactive design firm. Our little boutique partners with a lot of big agencies mostly because they don't want to keep interactive capabilities in house due to costs. The comment about "how come they can't make anything great without an agency" is really about the rolodex and the name. We could do larger scale projects with bigger initiaives, but getting in the door is tricky.

But sharing the glory rarely comes and we've learned to expect that until we can grow larger or steal the business. :)

Posted by: Hafiz on September 21, 2006 9:42 AM

Dave - Agencies like Crispin and Goodby put out good work bc they have great ideas. Sometimes, those ideas require a high level interactive/3D/Flash shop to get it done. An agency can always get their concept executed, but might not get it executed well - and the concept sinks. And there are varying degrees of responsibilities and roles for these engagements. Its not always as easy as "agency did concept" and "shop did production". Sometimes the outside shop does much more than make it functional and make it look pretty. A shared credit is not too much to expect for shared work, and the agency should allow the shops to show work youve done.

Posted by: chuck on September 21, 2006 9:48 AM







Featured FREE Resource: