ad:tech Miami: Multi-Platform World Simplifies Consumption, Not Our Jobs


It's my opinion that multi-platform marketing, despite its maddening number of nuances, has made a lot of advertisers lazy. Consider how many brands settled for a CGM contest during the last Super Bowl instead of sitting down to think of something genuinely unique and thrilling.

But lest we tread too far down the path of least resistance, it merits noting that while a two-way discourse between ourselves and The Consumer is nice, it's hardly made our job easier. And it isn't supposed to.

Multi-platform marketing suggests a much broader responsibility than just throwing your brand onto every medium you can imagine. You're not engaging in viral marketing, for example, if all you're doing is loading your :30 spots onto YouTube.

Do you really think The Consumer is that stupid?

The requisite stats on the multi-platform world:

- 65 million watchers voted for American idols via mobile phone
- User-generated videos aren't new; they've been around for years (a point we forget. Consider America's Funniest Home Video)
- Over 50 percent of US households will own a DVR by 2011 (Forrester)
- 37 million US households by 2011 will have broadband access

Broadcast companies no longer have the privilege of conveying messages to people sitting 10 feet away from the screen. They must now meet the marketplace on cell phones, online, and via other forms of mobile content.

Plus, "piracy" and faster, more available technology make for an uncomfortable compression of expectation - movies are released onto DVD just weeks after their cinema debuts, for example.

A massive generation gap also plays a big role. To quote (not quite to scale) Terry Semel, "My oldest daughter, aged 24, does a lot on the internet. My second daughter does everything on the internet. My third daughter, aged 13, lives online."

In an ideal world in which marketers imagine they can still segment the common man, there remain two axes of consumer:

- Passive users, which enjoy sitting on couch and being broadcast-to
- Gadgeteers* that engage/become interactive with content (social networking, etc)

How do you hit the gadgeteers? By unfolding the brand in multiple windows (called a 360 digital media platform):

- Online
- TV
- Mobile
- Social networking platform
- Developing world-class content created solely for people who are downloading, viral-swapping, etc

All these platforms can fool you into thinking that all you have to do is splatter a logo anywhere a consumer may think to look. But it's less a matter of getting people on our properties (sites, programs); it's a matter of getting them engaged in what we're saying.

That's the neat thing about ad:tech Miami, which has a strong contextual focus on the Latin market and the global market at large. M importantly than ensuring we're everywhere people are looking, we also need to make an effort to remain culturally relevant.

This isn't just a language thing; people are too unique for that. You need to hit them on a near-individual basis, easing into their unique worlds with the touch of a safecracker.

This is why viral marketing is so awesome. It leaves the door slightly ajar for brands to slide into a subculture on the ground floor.

The reason why we even care about hitting The Consumer on a number of platforms is not to deluge or box him/her in; it's because, at the end of the day, The Consumer is choosing where (and how!) s/he wants to absorb our message.

To set you on the right foot, remember the three W's:

Give people what they want, where they want, in the way they want.

If The Consumer feels s/he has to appropriate your brand, you better let them.

One example of a brand that has mastered the art of giving consumers what they want is Apple, which did more than see a need and fill it - they actually created a need with the introduction of the iPod. Apple is the quintessential WWW brand.

To note, our last speaker, a Macbook Pro user, did not step behind the podium to give his presentation. Unlike his three colleagues, which stood up old-school and addressed us with nervous laughter, the guy did everything from his seat, right on his trusty computer.

Tell me why Apple turns everyone, despite the so-called "generation gap," into a spoiled hipster.


* I realize this is off-topic, but I really hate words like "gadgeteer" and "marketeer" (which was also mentioned at this presentation**). They remind me of "mouseketeer," and I just can't stand the idea of running amock with big ears and a rubbery sword.

** At the risk of forgetting to mention it, the presentation in question was Media and Entertainment: Programming, Distribution and Advertising in a Multi-Platform World.

by Angela Natividad    Jun-27-07   Click to Comment   
Topic: Industry Events   

Enjoy what you've read? Subscribe to Adrants Daily and receive the daily contents of this site each day along with free whitepapers.



This is useful information, but like most marketing conferences, something we already knew, did we not?

Posted by: Dhaval Mehta on June 27, 2007 10:04 AM


Posted by: Angela on June 27, 2007 10:11 AM

Politicians and now, after this week’s Supreme Court decision, Unions too are concerned about the damage that can result from professional-looking TV commercials posted on social network sites such as YouTube and MySpace.

While attribution is often a fuzzy situation, with respect to SCGM served in industrial strength, it’s preternatural powers entice interaction without a nanosecond of thought from the target and viral results are fairly predictable based on extrapolation from “original sneeze.”

Seemingly Consumer GMnerated media (SCGM) is a powerful tool in the hands of professionals today, whether the Brand is a political person or a consumer brand, SCGM is rocking web 2.0 out of its socks with its cross platform spread, it's an uptrending but, still occult, exercise that must fly below the radar.

Original Sneeze example
: 27 second SCGM is uploaded to social site and within minutes an message with the link is sent to 50,000 college students an hour for ten hours to their cells from a dozen different locations worldwide. 36 hours later the fever is spreading of its own volition; lawyers and PR pros are scrambling and marketing teams are loading the cooler with ice and beverages.

;) thx for the very interesting post Angela, you rock!

Posted by: arthur on June 27, 2007 12:15 PM

I can't believe you used original sneeze.

Posted by: Angela on June 28, 2007 5:05 AM

the ethical questions surrounding SCGM and the scarlet letter/stigmatta aspect that results requires a tongue in cheek approach...;)
btw- the only picture of our pal Asa Bailey I could find on the web dates back to 2005 and it looks a good deal like a picture from yesterday's headline about Hamas! Asa did the hotjobs vids that looked like a stolen minute from a security camera capturing an embarrassing moment... ;P yargi-GARrr!

Posted by: arthur on June 28, 2007 3:00 PM

mea culpa. sorry it took so long... Here is one of the HotJobs ads that Asa Bailey did...

Asa has removed all links to it on his site. LOL, when searching for this link I first found this post! ;))

Posted by: arthur on July 2, 2007 3:59 PM

Featured FREE Resource: